family publication

IN THE COURT OF FAMILY JUDGE HYDERABAD
Family Suit NO. 23 of  2007


HASSAN MEHMOOD  ------------------------------------   Plaintiff
Versus
Gulnaz Ayoub      --------------------------------------    Defendant



         APPLICATION U/O 5 RULE 20 C.P.C.
        It is respectfully prayed on behalf of plaintiff that this Honourable Court may be pleased to pass necessary orders for substitute service/publication in Urdu-newspaper for service upon the defendant, on consideration of the grounds set out in accompanying affidavit.

        Prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Hyderabad
Dated: 30-4-2007        ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF FAMILY JUDGE HYDERABAD
Family Suit NO. 23 of  2007


HASSAN MEHMOOD  ------------------------------------   Plaintiff
Versus
Gulnaz Ayoub      --------------------------------------    Defendant

AFFIDAVIT.
        I, Hassan Mehmood s/o                        ¸ muslim, adult, Resident of                                  Hyderabad, do hereby state on oath as under:-
1-        That, I am plaintiff in the above matter, as such am well conversant with the facts of the matter.
2-        That, present affidavit and accompanying application for substitute service have been drafted and filed under my instructions and contents of the same are true and correct.
3-        That, all the ordinary modes of service have been applied, but defendant is malafidely avoiding from the service of the summons of the court.
4-        That, defendant malafidely wants to prolong the matter in order to create trouble for me.
5-        That, it is settled principle of law that family matters are to be decided/concluded in speedy manner.
6-        That, if the substitute service/publication is not allowed, then matter will be unnecessarily prolonged and will cause wastage of precious time of this Honourable Court.
7-        That, publication in the newspaper would be helpful for definite service upon the defendant there will remain no chance of non-service upon the defendant, so also purpose of natural justice will be served
8-        That, in case my accompanying application is not allowed, I will suffer irreparable loss and injury.
9-        That, contents of accompanying application may please be treated as part and parcel of this affidavit for the sake of brevity.
10-        Whatever stated above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
                                                                                                                                                             Hyderabad   
Dated: 25-3-2008                            ( DEPONENT )
( 2 )
I know the deponent above named

( Advocate )
    The deponent above named is identified by
, Advocate, who is personally known to me.

                    Commissioner for taking affidavit
    The contents of above affidavit have been read over and explained to deponent above named in his language at Hyderabad on this 25th day of March 2008 which he confirms by putting his signature as true and correct on solemn affirmation before me.

                     Commissioner for taking affidavit